INSERT COINS
Bond USDC and mint CAULT below market price. Your deposit goes straight into the vault — CAULT is never minted unbacked.
CALLS IN, USDC FLOOR OUT
Three moves. The chrome is a game show; the vault math underneath is deadly serious.
Bond USDC and mint CAULT below market price. Your deposit goes straight into the vault — CAULT is never minted unbacked.
AI contestants copy-trade the ranked caller league from X, inside a hard risk cage: the trading sleeve never exceeds 30% of the treasury.
Every realized win pays the caller a 15% USDC bounty. The other 85%: premium above 15% triggers buyback & burn; otherwise it lifts the floor.
Feed the machine, mint CAULT at a discount. Each epoch has limited capacity — when the power meter fills or the timer hits zero, a new round starts.
DROP AMOUNT
YOUR QUOTE — LIVE
Mints only against deposited USDC — never unbacked. The house builds its own liquidity backstage, pairing treasury USDC with market-bought CAULT.
Every agent move, called live. Wins pay the caller on the spot; burns get confetti. Newest first.
DEACON-9 drops $11,422 on $PONZU — copying @0xNostradamus
AGENT-3 cashes out $MOONCAT +$9,800
CALLER PAID! @wagmi_cassandra pockets a $1,470 USDC bounty. 6.7K CAULT bought back and burned forever.
$2,800 in fees hits the machine — floor cranked up
MANTIS-5 drops $14,891 on $SNEK — copying @0xNostradamus
ORACLE-7 drops $14,728 on $SOLDOG — copying @gigabrain_intern
Player bonds $61,400 USDC → mints 53.8K CAULT at -8.2%
AGENT-3 drops $33,648 on $PONZU — copying @SolSurgeonGeneral
Keeper drops $30,000 into the house pool — 12.1K CAULT bought off the open market, never printed
Fictional callers, real math: allocation follows the score, losses pay nothing, and the whole game fits inside a 30% sleeve.
top 8 by score split the prize pool · losses pay $0
| RANK | CALLER | HIT RATE | AVG WIN | PNL | BOUNTIES WON | STREAK | PRIZE POOL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 👑 | @0xNostradamusprophecies, 7 day money back | 66% | 3.1x | $41.4K | $4,969 | — | $367.5K · 14% of sleeve |
| 🥈 | @wagmi_cassandrasees the top, buys it anyway | 74% | 2.6x | $43.2K | $5,183 | 🔥×2 | $357.3K · 14% of sleeve |
| 🥉 | @SolSurgeonGeneralwarning: calls may cause gains | 69% | 2.2x | $89.8K | $10.8K | — | $338.5K · 13% of sleeve |
| 4 | @MadameMoonshotreads charts like tea leaves | 58% | 2.8x | $27.1K | $3,253 | — | $326.2K · 13% of sleeve |
| 5 | @gigabrain_internunpaid, unhinged, undefeated | 61% | 2.4x | $54.6K | $6,556 | — | $319.2K · 12% of sleeve |
| 6 | @exit_liquidity_enjoyersomehow always early | 57% | 2.1x | $35.5K | $4,264 | 🔥×1 | $303.7K · 12% of sleeve |
| 7 | @dip_buyer_dostoevskysuffering, then gains | 51% | 2.3x | $15.5K | $1,860 | 🔥×2 | $303.1K · 12% of sleeve |
| 8 | @ramen_whaleeats instant, trades size | 63% | 1.9x | $29.7K | $3,564 | 🔥×1 | $284.4K · 11% of sleeve |
| 9 | @ser_prints_a_lotthe printer is the friend | 55% | 1.8x | $34.5K | $4,144 | — | benched |
| 10 | @candlewatch_karenwould like to speak to the market | 53% | 1.7x | $22.2K | $2,659 | — | benched |
Allocation is proportional to score (hit rate, average multiple, streak, sample size). All handles are fictional contestants in the simulation.
What actually backs the floor. Session clock 13:37:00.